DimON Опубликовано August 14 Жалоба Share Опубликовано August 14 This week we’re exploring the future of shifting in MINIs — from manuals to DCTs to even EVs. First we gave you our opinion on the future of shift paddle design, then manual EVs. Today we finish the series on how to bring back the manual transmission itself. As the market splits between seamless, software-first transport and a smaller set of deliberately involving driver’s cars, a manual-centric JCW GP looks less like nostalgia and more like strategy. A numbered, higher-priced run could fund the return of the Getrag six speed, keep EU and UK fleet targets intact, and give MINI a halo that clearly signals what the brand stands for. The BMW M2 manual The market is splitting in two The industry has been drifting toward two clear camps. On one side are appliance cars that prioritize effortlessness and efficiency. On the other is a growing set of driver’s cars that trade on feel, feedback and involvement. BMW is a useful lens here. The brand is pushing Neue Klasse EVs for the appliance customer, while keeping a foothold in engagement with cars like the M2 and the manual Z4. The numbers back it up. Roughly half of U.S. M2 buyers chose a manual in 2023, a figure echoed by multiple outlets. And when BMW finally added a manual to the Z4, the take rate jumped to about 65 percent in the U.S. and sales rose meaningfully. That is not nostalgia. That is demand. BMW has leaned into this group in key places. The M2’s manual take rate isn’t just a fun statistic—it’s a loud signal that engagement still sells. The Z4’s stick-shift revival has transformed it from a niche player to a sales bright spot in the U.S. And BMW’s M division still offers manuals across several models, even as most rivals have walked away from them entirely. At the top of the market, this appetite for connection is mirrored in the industry at large. Gordon Murray’s T.50, Porsche’s 911 S/T, Pagani’s gated-manual hypercars, and Ferrari’s forthcoming F40-inspired tribute all speak to a desire for cars that demand something of the driver. They are the horological equivalent of a hand-built mechanical watch—objects of art and craft that ask you to participate in their function. Just as the quartz revolution in the 1970s gave the world watches that were cheaper, more accurate, and more convenient, the rise of automation and electrification has given us cars that are faster, quieter, and easier to live with. But in both worlds, the machines that endure—the ones that stir real passion—are the ones that wear their complexity and imperfection as a badge of honor. A manual gearbox, like a finely made movement, isn’t about necessity anymore; it’s about the tactile satisfaction of being part of the process. And in a time when technology can do almost everything for us, that human connection has never been more valuable. This divergence is not a fad. As more mainstream buyers lean into quiet, seamless, software-led cars, the analog experiences gain value precisely because they ask something of the driver. BMW has shown you can serve both worlds without losing your identity. MINI should do the same, and the GP is the obvious place to do it. The F56 JCW GP during prototype testing a 300 HP MINI with a Manual The GP has always been MINI’s purest statement of intent. GP1 and GP2 were manual only, built in small numbers and engineered to feel lighter, sharper and more direct than anything else in the range. GP3 delivered huge speed but lost some of that mechanical dialogue by defaulting to an automatic. A manual GP4 would reconnect the halo car with the qualities that made the first two GPs cult heroes. MINI has the transmission, and we know it works perfectly with the B48 four-cylinder. In fact, the Getrag 6-speed transmission, specifically the 420G model previously used by MINI, is designed for a maximum input torque of 420 Nm (310 lb-ft). That could allow MINI to potentially use one of the higher-output tunes of the B48, perhaps even the JCW Countryman’s 315 hp and 295 ft-lbs configuration. With all front wheel drive cars, the limit of acceleration will be grip, not power. While we’d expect a 0-60 time in the 5 second range, it wouldn’t be far down from the previous GP in straight-line speed. But the interactivity and driver engagement would be off the charts comparatively. The last manual GP, the R56 GP2 business case – stronger than it looks A manual GP4 should be a numbered, premium product. Price it accordingly and use that margin to fund reintroducing a Getrag six speed to the current platform. MINI has run Getrag manuals for years, and the brand already knows how to make a small batch feel special. Even BMW’s Z4 program shows customers will pay for the experience when it is positioned correctly, with the manual package itself priced as a premium. What about emissions and compliance in the EU and UK. Fleet rules are based on a manufacturer’s average across all new vehicles registered. A few thousand high engagement ICE cars will barely move the needle when spread across a large fleet, particularly as EV mix increases. In the UK, ZEV mandate mechanics and credit trading add more flexibility as long as the overall plan stays on track. In other words, small numbers and smart planning make a manual GP feasible without blowing up targets. Low volume is the point, not the problem. The GP has historically been produced in the low thousands, which makes it the ideal place to reintroduce a Getrag six speed without committing the entire lineup. One powertrain, one transmission, one purpose. That focus reduces configuration complexity, keeps validation work contained, and allows MINI to tune the final ten percent of calibration that turns a quick MINI into a great one. How to make a manual GP4 land Keep the recipe simple and intentional. Manual as the hero. Make the six speed the centerpiece. Celebrate it in the spec sheet, the order process and the cabin. No apology options. No “you can also get it with an auto.” This car is manual only. Tight volume, high content. Limit production and include what matters to drivers. Real seats with proper bolsters. Steering that feels mechanical rather than digital. Brake and cooling upgrades that work on track. Weight saved where it counts. Calibration over cosmetics. The GP has never been about wings first, dynamics second. Put the money into the final ten percent of tuning that transforms a quick MINI into a great one. This could be the last analogue MINI so make it count. Numbered edition, clear story. Tell customers exactly what they are buying into. A modern MINI that prioritizes feel over frictionless speed. The payoff for MINI This strategy does not chase volume. It builds brand equity. It gives loyalists something worth waiting for while giving newcomers a credible statement of intent. In a world where many cars are designed not to be noticed, a manual GP4 says MINI still believes driving can be the point. And that story is one that would resonate well beyond just owners of the car. It would make MINI stand for something that feels unique in the marketplace and authentic to its racing history. The broader market split creates the opening. BMW has proven that engagement still sells when you put it in the right product and price it like a luxury experience. MINI can draft behind that trend with a limited run GP that puts a Getrag back where it belongs. Do it in small numbers. Charge accordingly. Protect the fleet targets. Deliver the car that reminds everyone where MINI came from. If the next GP is going to stand for anything, let it stand for choice. Not the easy kind. The rewarding kind. The post Why the Next MINI Cooper JCW GP Should Be the Manual Halo for MINI appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article Ссылка на комментарий Поделиться на другие сайты More sharing options...
Recommended Posts