Вся активность

On 26 August 1959, the British Motor Corporation revealed a tiny four-seater that would change the industry. The Mini, penned by Alec Issigonis, wasn’t simply clever, it was revolutionary. With a transverse engine, wheels at the corners, and space for four adults in a car barely ten feet long, it was packaging genius wrapped in a shape that felt immediately timeless. No one could have guessed at that moment that the Mini would become an icon of 1960s culture, a Monte Carlo Rally giant killer, and eventually the backbone of BMW’s premium small-car brand. Sixty-six years later, MINI still balances Issigonis’ original ethos with reinvention. Racing to Immortality Just two years after launch, John Cooper saw the potential. The result was the 1961 Mini Cooper, quickly followed by the Cooper S. The pairing of lightweight chassis and tuned performance created one of the most dominant rally cars of its era. The legend was cemented in 1964 when Paddy Hopkirk, Henry Liddon, and a Mini Cooper S stunned the motorsport world by winning the Monte Carlo Rally outright. That win, covered in our recent deep dive here, was followed by victories in 1965 and 1967. What made these wins remarkable was that a tiny British saloon outpaced vastly more powerful rivals on one of the toughest events in the world. This was the foundation of John Cooper Works, a brand-within-a-brand that still represents MINI’s racing DNA. Our look at the origin of JCW shows how the tuning house transformed the Mini into something far greater than its humble roots suggested. The 1990’s concepts that led to the R50 Decline & Reinvention Despite the motorsport success, the Mini’s brilliance couldn’t save it from the chaos of the British car industry. By the 1980s production dwindled, though the car still had loyal fans. The Rover-era revivals of the Mini Cooper in the 1990s and even a convertible in 1992 kept the flame alive, but it wasn’t until BMW took ownership in 1994 that a credible future was plotted. That led to 2001, when MINI, reborn under BMW, made its debut. Production began at Oxford, and a new era started. The Modern Generations 2001–2006 (R50/R53): The first BMW MINI balanced retro styling with engineering sophistication. The R50 Cooper, R53 Cooper S, and limited John Cooper Works models brought back the go-kart feel in a way no one expected from a brand-new car. 2007–2013 (R56/R55/R57/R60): The second generation introduced turbocharged engines, more refined interiors, and broadened the line-up. The Clubman returned, the Convertible was modernized, and the Countryman arrived, stretching the definition of MINI into crossover territory. 2014–2023 (F56/F54/F60): The third generation grew in size and sophistication. A five-door Cooper joined the line, as did a second-generation Clubman and a larger Countryman. Performance ramped up with the JCW models, including the extreme GP3. The era also saw MINI expand personalization, infotainment, and premium positioning. 2019: The first all-electric MINI, the Cooper SE, arrived, an Oxford-built statement that electrification could still deliver MINI’s essential character. 2023–present (J01/U25/J05/F66): The current generation is MINI’s boldest. Fully electric Cooper and Countryman models lead the way, joined by the first-ever Aceman crossover. The updated F66 ICE models keep traditional petrol buyers happy, while the Convertible and new Cooper 5-Door bring breadth to the combustion line-up. JCW models continue to fly the performance flag, with Bulldog Racing proving their worth at the Nürburgring 24 Hours with a class win in 2024. Timeline of MINI Milestones 1959: BMC unveils the first Mini, designed by Alec Issigonis. 1961: The first Mini Cooper debuts, priced at £680. 1962: Annual production hits 200,000. 1963–64: The first Mini Cooper S is launched. 1964: Paddy Hopkirk wins Monte Carlo Rally in a Mini Cooper S. 1965: Timo Makinen secures back-to-back Monte Carlo win. 1965: Mini builds its millionth car. Automatic transmission becomes available. 1967: Rauno Aaltonen takes a third Monte Carlo victory for Mini. 1972: Three million Minis produced. 1981: Production drops to 70,000 a year. 1990: Rover revives the Mini Cooper as a limited run. 1992: The first factory Mini Convertible debuts. 1994: BMW acquires Rover and with it the Mini. 2001: World premiere of the BMW MINI. Production begins at Oxford. Cooper S debuts at Tokyo Motor Show. 2002: Oxford produces its 100,000th MINI. 2004: The MINI Cooper S Convertible is introduced. 2007: Diesel-powered MINIs arrive, alongside the Clubman. 2010: First-generation Countryman is unveiled. 2014: Five-door Cooper introduced. 2015: MINI adopts a new logo. 2016: Three million MINIs built at Oxford. 2020: First fully electric MINI (Cooper SE) enters production. 2021: New 3-door, 5-door, and Convertible debut. 2023: New electric Cooper and Countryman revealed. 2024: MINI Aceman premieres. Bulldog Racing wins Nürburgring class victory. 2024: New Cooper 5-Door and Convertible unveiled. 2025: Bulldog Racing scores second place at the Nürburgring 24 Hours. 66 Years and Counting MINI has lived many lives: a symbol of 1960s Britain, a motorsport underdog, a victim of industry decline, and now a thriving premium small-car brand with global reach. Today’s line-up—spanning from three-door Cooper to electric Aceman, shows that MINI is still evolving without losing sight of its roots. At 66 years old, MINI stands as proof that Alec Issigonis’ original idea was not just clever engineering but a foundation durable enough to carry across generations, powertrains, and even cultural shifts. And if history is any guide, this little car’s story is still far from finished. The post MINI Turns 66: A Look Back at Its History, Milestones and Motorsport Glory appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

MINI has once again turned to the world of fashion for its latest design collaboration. For the 2025 amfAR Gala in Salzburg, BMW Austria partnered with Lebanese designer Elie Saab to create a one-off MINI Cooper S that blends haute couture with MINI’s design language while supporting amfAR’s ongoing fight against HIV/AIDS. The car itself is based on the new F66 Cooper S, powered by BMW’s B48 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder producing 204 hp. In this case, the mechanicals remain untouched. What sets this car apart is the finish and the interior, where Saab’s eye for detail transforms the hatch into something closer to wearable art than a mass-produced car. The exterior wears a custom metallic gradient that fades from liquid copper through soft bronze to a subtle nude, giving the car a sculptural quality that changes depending on the light. The 18-inch slide-spoke wheels carry a satin finish with the Elie Saab logo etched into their surface, a small but intentional touch that links the car directly to the designer’s studio. Inside, Saab specified brown leather throughout the seats and door panels, quilted with his monogram. The collaboration goes further than visuals, though. MINI worked with Saab to integrate his fragrance “Golden,” developed with Culti Milano, into the cabin. A small leather-wrapped cushion near the steering wheel releases the scent of bitter orange and cedarwood, creating a multisensory atmosphere that makes this car unlike any other MINI. While much of the focus is on aesthetics, the purpose of the car is just as important. The MINI by Elie Saab was created for auction at the Salzburg gala, with proceeds going directly to amfAR’s HIV/AIDS research programs. For BMW Austria and MINI, this continues a tradition of pairing fashion-inspired one-offs with philanthropic causes, using design to spark interest and raise funds. The MINI by Elie Saab isn’t meant to preview production models or new options packages. Instead, it demonstrates how the brand can flex its design language in unexpected directions while aligning itself with cultural and philanthropic events. As a rolling one-off, it’s as much about the statement it makes in the ballroom as it is about the way it looks on the road. The post Exclusive MINI Cooper by Elie Saab Blends Couture and Performance appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

As MINI rolls out its most ambitious model lineup in years, MINI USA and MINI Financial Services are introducing EasyOwn — a new financing program designed to make MINI ownership simpler and more accessible than ever. At its core, EasyOwn is exactly what it sounds like: a straightforward, transparent approach to financing that aligns with MINI’s renewed focus on clarity, value, and customer empowerment. With MINI’s 2026 pricing strategy already making the brand more attainable, EasyOwn takes that accessibility a step further by demystifying the finance process and giving customers more control over their purchase. “MINI EasyOwn is a renewed commitment to making MINI ownership as intuitive and accessible as possible,” said Swati Licis, Department Manager, Marketing, Customer & Product Management at MINI Financial Services. “With a clear approach in step with MINI’s optimized pricing structure, we’re empowering customers to feel more in control of their journey.” Behind the scenes, this move is about more than just new paperwork. MINI Financial Services is aiming to boost awareness of its finance and lease options while reaching a broader audience — particularly first-time buyers and those new to the brand. It’s also part of a larger strategy to streamline the path to purchase and reinforce MINI’s position as a smart, stylish, premium alternative. And the timing couldn’t be better. MINI U.S. sales are on the rise, up 29.1% in Q2 of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 — driven largely by surging interest in the all-new Countryman. Year-to-date, sales are up 19%, signaling strong momentum as the brand transitions into this next chapter. Interested customers can learn more about MINI EasyOwn at MINIUSA.com/financial-services or by visiting their local MINI dealer. The post MINIUSA Launches EasyOwn: A Smarter Way to Buy Your Next MINI appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Mercedes-Benz is reportedly in advanced discussions to source BMW’s four-cylinder petrol engines for a wide range of its future models. The move, first reported by Germany’s Manager Magazin, could see one of BMW’s most important powerplants, the B48, playing a central role in both brands’ internal combustion futures – and by extension, MINI’s. According to Manager Magazin, the two German rivals are at a high level of planning and negotiations, with an announcement expected before the end of the year. If finalized, the deal would represent a major shift for Mercedes, which has recently slowed its EV roll-out in response to weaker-than-expected demand and is rethinking its ICE strategy. Why Mercedes Wants BMW’s B48 For Mercedes, the attraction is clear. The B48 engine family already meets Euro 7 standards and has been engineered for both longitudinal and transverse layouts. That flexibility means it can be dropped into everything from compact cars like the CLA and GLA to mid-size staples like the C-Class, E-Class, and GLC – not to mention the upcoming “Little G.” By contrast, Mercedes’ new in-house M252 four-cylinder, developed in Germany and built in China by Horse (a Geely-Renault joint venture), is limited in scope. Offered in the latest CLA with outputs ranging from 136 to 190 hp, it works well in mild-hybrid form but isn’t engineered for plug-in hybrid or range-extender applications. The B48, however, is already proven in such roles, giving Mercedes a ready-made solution without massive new R&D investment. What This Means for BMW and MINI For BMW, supplying engines to Mercedes would mark a historic first: two German luxury carmakers sharing combustion engines. It’s being framed as a “strategic step to cut development costs,” but it also signals that BMW has no intention of walking away from refining the B48 any time soon. And that’s where MINI comes in. The B48 powers nearly every MINI model today, from Cooper S to JCW, and if BMW is about to commit to a deeper, long-term development cycle for the engine, it suggests MINI will continue to benefit from upgrades in efficiency, emissions compliance, and potentially performance. A Shared Future and Shared Costs The partnership could go even further. Reports suggest the two companies may look at shared production hubs, including the possibility of a U.S.-based engine plant to avoid mounting import tariffs. There’s even speculation that gearboxes could be part of the agreement in the longer term. If this deal is signed, it won’t just reshape Mercedes’ ICE lineup. It could also lock in the B48 as BMW’s (and MINI’s) mainstay four-cylinder for years to come – a reassuring sign for those of us who still believe in the future of a turbocharged MINI Cooper S or JCW with petrol power. The post Mercedes Might Use BMW’s B48 Engine – What it Means For Future MINI Coopers appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

For nearly two decades, the MINI Cooper JCW GP has been the brand’s ultimate expression of performance — raw, rare, and always a little unhinged. From the mechanical honesty of the GP1, to the track-honed precision of the GP2, to the brutal speed and controversy of the GP3, each generation has redefined what a halo MINI can be. A fourth GP feels inevitable, but the real question is whether MINI can reinvent the formula as an EV. It turns out, they already did. First, let’s talk about what’s possible and how MINI could overcome some obvious drawbacks with its current EV formula. An Electric Future for the GP With MINI’s lineup expanding its EV offerings, it feels logical that a GP4 could be battery-powered. That alone would make it the most radical GP yet, but also the one most burdened with expectations. The challenge is obvious: how do you make an EV feel as raw and visceral as the GP1, or as precise and track-ready as the GP2? Modern EVs are fast, often brutally so, but they rarely deliver the engagement that makes cars like the GPs special. Without the drama of a rev-hungry combustion engine, MINI will need to lean on new forms of driver interaction. The MINI GPe prototype testing at the Nurburgring SURPRISE – MINI Has Already Built an Electric GP What’s often forgotten is that MINI has already built an electric GP concept. Back in 2020, the brand quietly developed a one-off prototype that was almost mechanically identical to the GP3, but swapped the turbocharged four-cylinder for a modified electric motor from the original i3 program. Unlike the later “Pacesetter” Formula E safety car, this wasn’t a design exercise or marketing showpiece. It was a genuine testbed meant to explore what a battery-powered GP could feel like. The project never went beyond a single prototype, but it revealed two things: MINI was serious about translating GP performance into the electric era, and there was clear potential for an EV to carry the GP badge. In many ways, that experiment feels like a direct ancestor of the GP4 we’re all speculating about now. The R56 MINI GP2 and it’s fantastic Getrag manual transmission The Opposite Direction Recently on MotoringFile, we argued that the next GP should bring back the manual transmission as MINI’s true halo car. A numbered, limited-run GP with a six-speed could have been a powerful statement — not just nostalgia, but a strategic move to clearly define MINI as a brand still rooted in driver engagement. The reality, however, is that such a car is unlikely. With tightening EU fleet emissions targets and MINI’s rapid shift to electrification, resources are more likely to go toward a performance EV than resurrecting a manual ICE halo. Which brings us back to the GP4 — or perhaps the first “GPe.” Toyota’s EV manual prototype has been wowing journalists who have driven it Lessons from Others The good news is that the blueprint for an engaging EV is already emerging. Hyundai’s Ioniq 5 N has shown what’s possible, offering simulated gear ratios, rev-matched downshifts, and even the sensation of engine braking to create a surprisingly authentic manual-like EV experience. Toyota is going further still, experimenting with a prototype that features a clutch pedal and shifter that can even stall. If MINI builds on these ideas, a GPe could deliver a new type of engagement — one that doesn’t feel like a substitute for a manual, but instead redefines what “engagement” means in the electric era. Why We Still Need a GP The success of past GPs has never come from outright horsepower alone. The GP1 wasn’t the most powerful MINI, but it felt alive thanks to its lightness and mechanical honesty. The GP2 wasn’t about straight-line speed, but about its balance and composure on track. Even the GP3, for all its controversy, proved that usability and comfort can matter in a car this extreme. That lesson should carry into the GP4. Strip away what isn’t needed. Add intensity to what remains. Keep weight in check, prioritize chassis tuning, and deliver something rare and memorable. If MINI follows that formula, an electric GP could feel every bit as special as its predecessors. The US Market Problem There’s one big catch in all of this: production location. If the GP4 is based on the upcoming J01 MINI Cooper EV, it would almost certainly be built in China as part of MINI’s Spotlight joint venture. That immediately complicates things for the US market. Why? Tariffs. Any Chinese-built EV imported to the US is subject to steep import duties, which would push the GP4’s price into uncomfortable territory. Given the GP has always been a premium but attainable halo model, the added cost would likely make it a non-starter here. That means if MINI wants to sell the next GP in the US, it would need to produce it in Oxford or Leipzig — the only way to avoid tariffs and keep the car remotely competitive on price. Otherwise, American enthusiasts could be left watching from the sidelines while Europe and Asia get MINI’s first electric GP. More Than a Halo Done right, an electric GP4 could be more than just a collector’s piece. It could serve as MINI’s halo for the EV era, setting the tone for what performance looks like across the lineup. Just as the GP1 showed that MINI could build something truly hardcore, a GP4 could prove that EVs don’t have to sacrifice engagement. The stakes are high. But if history tells us anything, MINI’s GPs have always thrived under pressure. And the fourth act may just be the most important of The post Future of the MINI Cooper JCW GP Might Be Electric appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Друзья, привет! Если вы меняли вентилятор радиатора, подскажите какая есть достойная замена оригинальному? Партнамбер оригинального 17422752632, но его цена сейчас - 80 тыс под заказ. Экзист предлагает в качестве альтернативы за приемлемую цену, например Nissens, но: 1) Во-первых, у него в характеристиках указано, что потребляемая мощность 216Вт, диаметр 360мм (поисковик говорит мне, что у оригинального вентилятора мощность 350Вт, диаметр 401мм, но удостовериться в этом я не могу) 2) во-вторых, он тоже под заказ со сроком в месяц. Mahle тоже под заказ и стоимость выше, чем у оригинального. В общем вопрос: что выбрать? Авто - Mini Cooper S 2009 года

MINI is extending BMW Group’s “RELAX. WE CARE.” AI powered service to MINI with the rollout of Proactive Care. The idea is simple but powerful: let the car act like a digital concierge, spotting service needs before they become problems and reaching out to the driver with solutions. Here’s what it means to MINI owners; Proactive Care at MINI is about flipping the script and letting the car and MINI proactively identify needs, provide support, and keep drivers focused on their day to day. And the best part is that MINI has already soft-launched this in several key marketing and will be bringing this to others in the months ahead. How It Works If the car detects an issue—whether it’s a tyre diagnostic, error message, or scheduled maintenance—the owner is automatically notified. From there, MINI offers tailored solutions through the MINI app, in-car alerts, email, SMS, or even a phone call from the service partner or roadside assistance. If a workshop visit is required, the driver’s preferred MINI service partner receives a detailed report, allowing them to run a remote diagnosis in advance. Transparency is central: completed work, costs, and appointments are all trackable from the app. In short, MINI drivers no longer need to chase down service—service comes to them. Customer Satisfaction First MINI positions Proactive Care as a shift in philosophy: the service partner no longer waits for the customer to ask, but instead takes the initiative. The goal is simple—boost satisfaction by reducing stress and interruptions, letting owners focus on what MINI is all about: the joy of driving. To get started, drivers need the MINI app, an active MINI Connected contract, and a registered service partner. Full consent to data sharing is also required, but MINI stresses that data protection is a top priority. Information is collected strictly in line with GDPR and other national regulations. Rollout Plans The service launched in Italy and the UK earlier this year, followed by Germany, Korea, Spain, and the Benelux region. France, China, and the US are next in line for the second half of 2025. Marketing with a Twist Fittingly, MINI is promoting Proactive Care with a campaign set in the Scottish Highlands, created entirely with artificial intelligence. No cars, crews, or cameras were used in production. The campaign makes its public debut at the IAA and will roll out globally in October. The post MINI Launches AI Driven Proactive Care In US and Global Markets appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

It’s rare to get all three generations of the MINI JCW GP back-to-back, but over the last 30 days we’ve had that chance to get reacquainted with these legendary MINIs. First came the raw, supercharged GP1, then the Nürburgring-honed GP2, and most recently the controversial but undeniably fast GP3. Three cars separated by nearly 15 years, each with its own personality, flaws, and flashes of brilliance. Which brings up some obvious question; which is the one we’d want in our garage? After many miles behind the wheel of each, we came up with some answers. The 2006 MINI GP1 (R53) – Raw, Rare, Remarkable The first GP was a shock to the system. Supercharged instead of turbocharged, stripped of rear seats, and built in limited numbers, it felt like something truly special. The immediacy of the R53’s steering and the whine of its Eaton blower gave it a mechanical honesty you simply don’t find anymore. The GP1 is smaller than you remember, but more alive than you could hope for. In our recent revisit, the GP1 felt smaller than memory suggested, but also more alive. It wasn’t the fastest, nor the most refined, but it had that intangible “rightness” — the balance of feedback, weight, and playfulness that makes it endlessly rewarding. It remains the purest GP, one that gets better with age. The 2012 MINI GP2 (R56) – The Track Masterpiece By the second act, MINI had something to prove. The GP2 traded supercharged drama for turbocharged efficiency, but what it really delivered was a chassis tuned to perfection. Developed with countless laps of the Nürburgring, it featured stiffer suspension, bespoke geometry, and aerodynamics that actually worked. The GP2 may not be the fastest, but it is still the ultimate track MINI. Behind the wheel, the GP2 feels sharper and more composed than the GP1, with a level of control that inspires confidence at the limit. The engine doesn’t overwhelm, but the chassis and braking create a car that is precise in ways that no GP has been before or since. Because of that, it shines brighter than either the GP1 or GP3 on track. While the R56 generation was generally considered to be less of a driver’s car than the R53, here with the coil-over suspension and extra chassis bracing, it feels transformed. You can get a real sense of the brief MINI was after with this GP. This was intended to be the ultimate track car in MINI form and they succeeded at almost every level. It’s just a shame they couldn’t squeeze out a bit more power. The 2020 MINI GP3 (F56) – Fast, Flawed, and Surprisingly Usable The third GP broke the mold again, this time with brute force: over 300 horsepower, an automatic-only transmission, and dramatic design flourishes like those carbon fender blades. On paper it was the fastest MINI ever built, but in practice it was more complicated. The GP3 is flawed, but it is the first GP you could live with every day. In our time with it, the GP3 proved devastatingly quick in a straight line, its torque-rich four-cylinder flattening highways and backroads alike. Yet it wasn’t as engaging as its predecessors — the automatic dulled the edge, and the chassis sometimes felt caught between road car comfort and track car intent. If this was a well-programmed DCT perhaps things would be different. But with the torque converter automatic, this is a car that feels confused in what it’s trying to be. Still, where it surprised was daily usability. It’s refined enough for commuting, comfortable on long drives, and, unlike the GP1 and GP2, doesn’t feel like a car you have to make excuses for. And let’s be honest, power (and especially torque) is quite addictive. MINI JCW GP Generational Comparison Looking at the data, it’s almost shocking to see how the power and torque grew with the introduction of the GP3. However the moment you look one row over and see the automatic transmission listed, you realized that that car was a very different concept than the first two GPs. GP GenerationYearMSRP (US)PowerTorqueWeightTransmissionGP1 (R53)2006$31,150215 hp184 lb-ft2,668 lbs6-speed manualGP2 (R56)2012$39,950218 hp192 lb-ft2,745 lbs6-speed manualGP3 (F56)2020$44,900301 hp332 lb-ft2,855 lbs8-speed automatic Our Verdict If we could only have one, the R53 GP1 would be our pick for the garage. It’s the car that best captures the MINI spirit — raw, rare, and endlessly involving. It’s not the most relaxing thing to drive last distances but my lord does it engage you as a driver. For the track, the GP2 stands above the rest. Its balance, composure, and precision make it the ultimate driver’s tool, even if it’s not the most powerful. If you want purity and focus, this is your GP. And then there’s the GP3. Not perfect, not pure, but fast and comfortable in a way the others never were. It’s the one you could drive every day without sacrifice. But for us, the most special car here is the one that started it all. It’s the slowest, least sophisticated, and certainly the least comfortable. But if we’re judging a car on the joy it brings, there’s simply nothing else like it here. MINI GP Gallery Processed with VSCO with a6 preset The post Every MINI JCW GP Driven and Ranked appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

For years MINI carried a reputation that was equal parts thrill and headache. On one hand, the cars topped “fun-to-drive” lists with their go kart handling and cheeky style. On the other, they often scraped the bottom of reliability rankings, culminating in a dead-last finish in J.D. Power’s 2009 Initial Quality Survey. The message was clear: if you wanted a MINI, you had to love it enough to forgive it. That reputation has lingered long past its expiration date. Because the truth is, MINI reliability has taken a dramatic turn for the better since 2014. To understand just how far the brand has come, you have to look at the story across four generations. The First Generation: Brilliant but Disposable (2001–2006) The reborn MINI launched in 2001 to global applause. The R50 Cooper and R53 Cooper S delivered retro-inspired styling and go-kart handling that made them instant icons. They also carried early BMW-era teething issues. It’s not surprising when you consider the R50’s rather troubled and frantic engineering process that moved from the UK to Munich, all while a last-second move of production sites. Look under the skin, and you’ll see a fascinating mix of Rover-era parts mingled with BMW-sourced components. This has led to numerous qualities issues as the cars have aged. Transmission failures, premature rust along the sills, and electrical glitches aren’t uncommon. To make matters worse, many of the critical components are nearly impossible to find now. Even something as consequential as the R53’s Eaton supercharger is out of production with no official recourse from BMW if yours happens to fail. Much of these issues were just starting to crop-up when the R50 and R53 generation ended production in 2006. But as the years have passed, they’ve only become more obvious. Still if there was one used MINI we’d love to have, it’s an R53. The Second Generation: new Reliability Concerns (2007–2013) The second generation, led by the R56 Cooper and later joined by the R60 Countryman, promised better engineering and refinement. Yet by 2009, MINI was ranked dead last in J.D. Power’s Initial Quality Survey. How did MINI let this happen? In short BMW was looking to engineer second generation MINI on a budget. The R56 platform was a heavily reworked R50 despite an all new look. Then there was the drivetrain. BMW didn’t have a four cylinder designed to work transversely and power the front wheels. So they turned to PSA and leveraged their “Prince” engine family. While BMW had some input in specifications, PSA engineered and built the engine entirely on its own. Unfortunately that choice proved to be a bad one as the engine quickly became known for timing chain tensioner failures and oil starvation. Making matters worse was MINI’s decision to save a few dollars and remove any oil warning notification for the driver. The R60 expanded MINI into new territory but carried many of the same concerns. Some issues were mitigated with the mid-cycle refresh in 2011 but many remained throughout the life-cycle of this generation. The R56 generation of MINIs can be great cars and, if looked after, can also be reliable. But all of this only deepened MINI’s reputation for fun but fragile cars. The Third Generation: Make Or Break for MINI (2014–2023) Everything changed in 2014 with the launch of the F56. MINI was all too aware of the quality issues because they were often the ones paying for them as warranty claims. So much so that dealers would often make much more money on warranty fixes than actually selling cars. So MINI went to work. The first key decision was to engineer the 3rd generation MINI to BMW build quality for the first time. Built on BMW’s UKL platform, with new B38 and B48 modular engines and vastly improved manufacturing processes and equality. And MINI wasn’t alone. BMW had been seeing their own quality issues (albeit unrelated) and had put enormous effort into over-engineering aspects of cars and components during this time. I wasn’t soon after launch when we started seeing a difference. The first signs came when we began hearing from service departments that they were seeing noticeably fewer warranty claims. Then in 2017, for the first time perhaps ever, MINI went an entire year without a single recall. Owners found the cars felt more solid and more BMW-like in perceived quality. Independent studies confirmed the transformation. By 2019 MINI had climbed to fourth overall in J.D. Power’s Dependability Study, a stunning turnaround from ranking near the bottom of the industry only a decade earlier. That same year MINI was recognized as the most dependable sporty hatch sold in the U.S. Recent model years have continued the trend. The 2018 Cooper Hardtop scored 81 out of 100 in J.D. Power’s Quality and Reliability index. The 2020 four-door Hardtop climbed to 84. The 2024 Cooper Hardtop remains strong at 82. All three ratings fall into the “Great” category. In the 2024 J.D. Power Vehicle Dependability Study, which looks at three-year-old vehicles, MINI tied for third among all brands with a score of 174 problems per 100 vehicles. The Fourth Generation: F66 and U25 (2024 Onward) Now comes the fourth chapter. The new F66 Hardtop and U25 Countryman are evolutionary updates of the F56 and F60 platforms rather than clean-sheet redesigns. That was a deliberate choice as MINI was spending billions developing it’s first electric cars in the J01 and J05. But the downstream affects may ultimately prove beneficial to owners as MINI simply refined what already had been working. The B38 and B48 engines carried over with updates, as did many of the structural and electrical systems that have proven robust. If history is any guide, this generation will continue to deliver solid dependability while layering on new technology and design. Conclusion: From Fragile to Formidable MINI’s reputation for unreliability wasn’t an accident. The first two generations had real problems, and even if not every owner suffered them, the stories stuck. What those stories don’t reflect is how dramatically things changed with the third generation. Reliability improved, recalls nearly disappeared, and by the time the fourth generation arrived MINI was building on strength, not fixing old mistakes. Today independent surveys place the brand among the most dependable in the industry — something unthinkable fifteen years ago. Yes, modern MINIs still have quirks, but the numbers tell the real story. MINI went from dead last in J.D. Power’s quality rankings in 2009 to top five in 2019 and 2024. That is not just improvement. That is a complete transformation. The post MINI Cooper Quality: How the Brand Went From Dead Last to Top 5 in Reliability appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Monterey Car Week is chaos—beautiful, turbocharged, champagne-soaked chaos. A swirl of past and future, where 250 GTOs idle next to Rimacs, and every third person claims they once drove a McLaren F1 “before they were cool.” It’s a place where you can see billion-dollar auctions, pre-war Bentleys on the street, and watch a guy valet a Koenigsegg like it’s a Camry. And in the midst of it all we were there, driving something that turns as many heads as almost anything there; an original 1965 MINI Cooper S. A couple few years ago I had a chance to spend a good portion of Monterey Car Week behind the wheel of BMW’s own classic MINI Cooper S. A near perfect example of the vintage, this was an original with the gorgeous fabric seats, sliding windows and all of the ingenious interior spacial layout that eventually gave way to safety features. Which would you choose to upstage hyper cars? I lost count of the LaFerraris I saw Cars like this were just tucked away in the Quail parking lot like a Toyota Corolla In a world where hyper-car upmanship is the de rigor, a vintage Cooper S was oddly almost exotic in comparison. The car was buried deep in BMW’s temporary Monterey HQ—a time capsule with low miles, honest patina, and more charm than anything else in the fleet. Given the choice between things like an M8 or this little red David, the decision was easy. The M8 might be faster and more comfortable, but it’s not getting parked next to a Ferrari 275 and still turning heads. The Mini? It is the head-turner. While the entire Monterey Car Week experience is a bucket list for an automotive enthusiasts, there’s one event that has always been our favorite slice of the madness; The Quail: A Motorsports Gathering. If Pebble Beach is the gala dinner, The Quail is the afterparty that’s somehow more curated and more fun. It’s where the world’s rarest machines get air, sun, and just enough dirt on the tires to remind you they’re still cars, not museum pieces. And the highlight of my time with the ’65 Cooper S was my drive from the Rolex Monterey Motorsports Reunion to the Quail. I left from Laguna Seca, aiming the Mini up Laureles Grade—a short, twisty climb that gets real steep, real fast. With just 76 horses trying their best and 90-degree heat pressing in, I made it to the top, just barely. The temperature gauge was pinned, the cabin was a sauna, and both the car and I were in need of a break. Classic Mini ownership 101: when in doubt, pull over and enjoy the view. Leaning against the front fender, I enjoyed the views of the valley below as much as the cars that drove by. Ten minutes later, I was back in, contorted behind the upright wheel and oddly placed pedals, heading down the back side of the hill—and into that glorious sweet spot where the Mini truly comes alive. The balance, the directness, the sound… it’s pure driving joy. Light on horsepower, heavy on feel. Naturally going down was a bit more fun than going up. At the bottom Laureles Grade I was meant to turn right, toward The Quail. Instead, I turned left. Because Carmel Valley Road was there. And when you’re in a 50+ year-old Cooper S, on that road, with the California hills turning gold in the late morning sun—well, the show can wait. After most of the cars had cleared out Windows open as far as possible One of two Senna’s that were parked within 50 ft. Eventually, the Mini and I rolled into The Quail’s show field. Or, more accurately, into its fabled parking lot, which is a concours in its own right. McLaren Sennas, Bugatti Chirons, Singer 911s… and one tiny Mini, buzzing into its spot like it owned the place. And somehow, it kind of did. Inside the gates, The Quail delivered as always: the cars, the crowd, the perfectly over-the-top catering, the kind of conversations where someone casually mentions their “Miura SVJ”—as in their Miura SVJ. It’s not subtle. But that’s the point. Snapping pics and sitting in hyper cars is hard work The epic looking new Pantera Light aircraft ready for orders A quick game of bocci? The original Lotus Emira ordering sheet Dario Franchitti looking over a potential Singer order The $15 NEW Bugatti Centodieci The very first Lotus Emira The Singer stand And that’s really the magic of Monterey Car Week. It’s too much—too expensive, too exclusive, too absurd—and yet somehow, it works. It’s a week where you can see the most significant cars in history, hang out in a paddock full of legends, and drive a 1965 Mini Cooper S past a valet line that looks like a Geneva motor show stand. So yes, The Quail may be the crown jewel, but the whole week is a gearhead fever dream. And if you do it right—if you choose character over clout, and driving over posturing—you’ll find the kind of moments that remind you why we fell in love with cars in the first place. Just be sure to show up in a Classic Mini if you want to turn heads. Which would you choose to upstage hyper cars? I lost count of the LaFerraris I saw Snapping pics and sitting in hyper cars is hard work A quick game of bocci? Light aircraft ready for orders The epic looking new Pantera The $15 NEW Bugatti Centodieci Dario Franchitti looking over a potential Singer order The original Lotus Emira ordering sheet The very first Lotus Emira The Singer stand Cars like this were just tucked away in the Quail parking lot like a Toyota Corolla The post Driving a Classic MINI Cooper S at Monterey Car Week appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

This week we’re exploring the future of shifting in MINIs — from manuals to DCTs to even EVs. First we gave you our opinion on the future of shift paddle design, then manual EVs. Today we finish the series on how to bring back the manual transmission itself. As the market splits between seamless, software-first transport and a smaller set of deliberately involving driver’s cars, a manual-centric JCW GP looks less like nostalgia and more like strategy. A numbered, higher-priced run could fund the return of the Getrag six speed, keep EU and UK fleet targets intact, and give MINI a halo that clearly signals what the brand stands for. The BMW M2 manual The market is splitting in two The industry has been drifting toward two clear camps. On one side are appliance cars that prioritize effortlessness and efficiency. On the other is a growing set of driver’s cars that trade on feel, feedback and involvement. BMW is a useful lens here. The brand is pushing Neue Klasse EVs for the appliance customer, while keeping a foothold in engagement with cars like the M2 and the manual Z4. The numbers back it up. Roughly half of U.S. M2 buyers chose a manual in 2023, a figure echoed by multiple outlets. And when BMW finally added a manual to the Z4, the take rate jumped to about 65 percent in the U.S. and sales rose meaningfully. That is not nostalgia. That is demand. BMW has leaned into this group in key places. The M2’s manual take rate isn’t just a fun statistic—it’s a loud signal that engagement still sells. The Z4’s stick-shift revival has transformed it from a niche player to a sales bright spot in the U.S. And BMW’s M division still offers manuals across several models, even as most rivals have walked away from them entirely. At the top of the market, this appetite for connection is mirrored in the industry at large. Gordon Murray’s T.50, Porsche’s 911 S/T, Pagani’s gated-manual hypercars, and Ferrari’s forthcoming F40-inspired tribute all speak to a desire for cars that demand something of the driver. They are the horological equivalent of a hand-built mechanical watch—objects of art and craft that ask you to participate in their function. Just as the quartz revolution in the 1970s gave the world watches that were cheaper, more accurate, and more convenient, the rise of automation and electrification has given us cars that are faster, quieter, and easier to live with. But in both worlds, the machines that endure—the ones that stir real passion—are the ones that wear their complexity and imperfection as a badge of honor. A manual gearbox, like a finely made movement, isn’t about necessity anymore; it’s about the tactile satisfaction of being part of the process. And in a time when technology can do almost everything for us, that human connection has never been more valuable. This divergence is not a fad. As more mainstream buyers lean into quiet, seamless, software-led cars, the analog experiences gain value precisely because they ask something of the driver. BMW has shown you can serve both worlds without losing your identity. MINI should do the same, and the GP is the obvious place to do it. The F56 JCW GP during prototype testing a 300 HP MINI with a Manual The GP has always been MINI’s purest statement of intent. GP1 and GP2 were manual only, built in small numbers and engineered to feel lighter, sharper and more direct than anything else in the range. GP3 delivered huge speed but lost some of that mechanical dialogue by defaulting to an automatic. A manual GP4 would reconnect the halo car with the qualities that made the first two GPs cult heroes. MINI has the transmission, and we know it works perfectly with the B48 four-cylinder. In fact, the Getrag 6-speed transmission, specifically the 420G model previously used by MINI, is designed for a maximum input torque of 420 Nm (310 lb-ft). That could allow MINI to potentially use one of the higher-output tunes of the B48, perhaps even the JCW Countryman’s 315 hp and 295 ft-lbs configuration. With all front wheel drive cars, the limit of acceleration will be grip, not power. While we’d expect a 0-60 time in the 5 second range, it wouldn’t be far down from the previous GP in straight-line speed. But the interactivity and driver engagement would be off the charts comparatively. The last manual GP, the R56 GP2 business case – stronger than it looks A manual GP4 should be a numbered, premium product. Price it accordingly and use that margin to fund reintroducing a Getrag six speed to the current platform. MINI has run Getrag manuals for years, and the brand already knows how to make a small batch feel special. Even BMW’s Z4 program shows customers will pay for the experience when it is positioned correctly, with the manual package itself priced as a premium. What about emissions and compliance in the EU and UK. Fleet rules are based on a manufacturer’s average across all new vehicles registered. A few thousand high engagement ICE cars will barely move the needle when spread across a large fleet, particularly as EV mix increases. In the UK, ZEV mandate mechanics and credit trading add more flexibility as long as the overall plan stays on track. In other words, small numbers and smart planning make a manual GP feasible without blowing up targets. Low volume is the point, not the problem. The GP has historically been produced in the low thousands, which makes it the ideal place to reintroduce a Getrag six speed without committing the entire lineup. One powertrain, one transmission, one purpose. That focus reduces configuration complexity, keeps validation work contained, and allows MINI to tune the final ten percent of calibration that turns a quick MINI into a great one. How to make a manual GP4 land Keep the recipe simple and intentional. Manual as the hero. Make the six speed the centerpiece. Celebrate it in the spec sheet, the order process and the cabin. No apology options. No “you can also get it with an auto.” This car is manual only. Tight volume, high content. Limit production and include what matters to drivers. Real seats with proper bolsters. Steering that feels mechanical rather than digital. Brake and cooling upgrades that work on track. Weight saved where it counts. Calibration over cosmetics. The GP has never been about wings first, dynamics second. Put the money into the final ten percent of tuning that transforms a quick MINI into a great one. This could be the last analogue MINI so make it count. Numbered edition, clear story. Tell customers exactly what they are buying into. A modern MINI that prioritizes feel over frictionless speed. The payoff for MINI This strategy does not chase volume. It builds brand equity. It gives loyalists something worth waiting for while giving newcomers a credible statement of intent. In a world where many cars are designed not to be noticed, a manual GP4 says MINI still believes driving can be the point. And that story is one that would resonate well beyond just owners of the car. It would make MINI stand for something that feels unique in the marketplace and authentic to its racing history. The broader market split creates the opening. BMW has proven that engagement still sells when you put it in the right product and price it like a luxury experience. MINI can draft behind that trend with a limited run GP that puts a Getrag back where it belongs. Do it in small numbers. Charge accordingly. Protect the fleet targets. Deliver the car that reminds everyone where MINI came from. If the next GP is going to stand for anything, let it stand for choice. Not the easy kind. The rewarding kind. The post Why the Next MINI Cooper JCW GP Should Be the Manual Halo for MINI appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

This week we’re exploring the future of shifting in MINIs — from manuals to DCTs to even EVs. First we gave you our opinion on the future of shift paddle design. Today it’s all about EVs. Why MINI and BMW M May Be Poised to Resurrect the Art of Shifting in the Electric Era Electric drivetrains may not need traditional gears, but driver-focused brands know that performance isn’t just about speed—it’s about connection. MINI, a brand built on engagement, could take inspiration from Hyundai’s approach with the Ioniq 5 N, and BMW M’s own evolving interest in simulated shifting, to create an electric driving experience that still delivers the thrill of changing gears. Hyundai’s Ioniq 5 N, developed under former BMW M boss Albert Biermann, sets a new benchmark for engagement in an EV. Its “e-shift” system simulates gear ratios, delivers rev-matched downshifts, mimics the sensation of engine braking through regenerative tuning, and layers in convincing engine sound. The result isn’t just theatre—it’s a purposeful, mechanical-feeling interface that keeps drivers thinking about their next move. Toyota is taking the concept even further, working on an EV manual transmission complete with a clutch pedal and realistic stall behavior, slated to debut around 2026. Toyota’s prototype EV manual (Photo courtesy of Car & Driver) BMW M is heading in a similar direction. M boss Frank van Meel has been open about the division’s work on what he calls “artificial transmission” technology, developed over several years to replicate the sensory cues of an internal combustion car. “I like the way they think—that’s the way we think as well,” van Meel said when asked about Hyundai’s approach. “In a pure EV with one gear, no sound and no emotion, you don’t know if you’re doing 125, 150 or whatever… You need to find a connection to the brain of the driver, without forcing you to look at your speedometer.” For van Meel, especially on track, the absence of shifting robs the driver of instinctive, real-time feedback—something simulated gears and sounds can restore. BMW’s Heart of Joy Prototype previews the next M3 This technology is expected to make its way into BMW’s first fully electric M car, a high-performance sedan based on the Neue Klasse platform arriving around 2026–2027. Likely featuring a quad-motor setup and advanced central vehicle controls, this next generation M3 could blend staggering performance with carefully tuned sensory feedback to keep drivers engaged without traditional hardware. MINI, sharing technology and engineering resources with BMW M, is in a perfect position to adapt this thinking for its own enthusiast-focused EVs. A future JCW model could incorporate paddle-shifted simulated gears with the same purposeful feel as the Ioniq 5 N, while a special edition could even experiment with a simplified clutch pedal for purists. Done right, this wouldn’t be a gimmick—it would be a bridge between the analog engagement of the past and the digital precision of the future. The MotoringFile Take Critics might dismiss simulated shifting as an unnecessary trick, but the early response to Hyundai’s system suggests otherwise. Reviewers praise how it adds back a sense of rhythm, speed awareness, and anticipation that single-speed EVs often lack. Judging from our time behind the wheel o the Ioniq 5 N, it really does add to the experience. And based on what we’ve heard about Toyota’s true manual EV prototype, that takes things even further. With BMW M embracing the same philosophy, MINI has an opportunity to stand out in the electric era—not just for its design or agility, but for delivering the tactile joy of shifting into the future. The post Future MINI Cooper EVs Could Revive The Manual Driving Experience appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

This week we’re exploring the future of shifting in MINIs — from manuals to DCTs to even EVs. First up – paddles. From the original 1959 Austin Seven to the R53 Cooper S, MINI has built its reputation on driver engagement. The steering feel, the chassis balance, the immediacy of response — these have always been central to the brand’s identity. And for decades, shifting has been a key part of that connection. Whether it was a classic four-speed manual or the slick six-speed in modern models, the act of changing gears has been part of what makes a MINI feel alive in your hands. But that feeling doesn’t necessarily have to die with the manual. Yes we wish the manual was still available. But the likelihood of it coming back is slim. So how do you keep that same sense of engagement when the driver is no longer working a clutch pedal? Like many brands, MINI’s answer has been to offer paddle shifters. But too often, paddles are treated as a box to check rather than a core part of the driving experience. They feel light, vague, and plasticky — and MINI is no exception. The GP3 and its 3D printed aluminum shift paddles. They were cold to the touch and felt great but were still let down by a shallow click. The fix is not complicated. MINI could deliver crisper, more mechanical actuation paired with higher-quality materials like aluminum (as they did with the GP) or even carbon fiber. Match this with a mechanism that feels positive and crisp and you have an experience that can become almost addictive in a tactile way. The goal should be for every upshift or downshift to feel intentional, with the kind of precision that makes you want to use the paddles every time you get in the car. Not because you have to, but because you enjoy the process and interaction. Why Feel Matters as Much as Function There are plenty of examples in the performance world where paddle shifters become part of the driving experience rather than a token add-on. Ferrari and Lamborghini paddles are long, cool to the touch, and deliver a satisfying click that feels connected directly to the drivetrain. Porsche’s PDK paddles are shorter, but the action is also tight and decisive, matched by instantaneous gearbox response. Even the electric Hyundai Ioniq 5 N uses substantial paddles that double as regenerative braking controls, yet still feel purposeful in the hand. But MINI doesn’t even need to look that far. BMW and specifically its M Division have been created good (not quite great) shift paddles for years in their M cars. Add this the M buttons on the wheel and M cars have created an entirely new way to engage with the car and its modes that’s always at your fingertips. It’s something that MINI’s JCW brand could learn from. In each of these cases, the magic is not just in the paddle design. It is also in how car responds to the command. The physical design and feel of the paddles is the easy part. The real challenge is getting the engine and its software to respond in a way that matches the driver’s expectations. Every shift input needs to trigger a reaction that is both quick and consistent. Without that immediacy and predictability, even the best-feeling paddles will feel disconnected from the driving experience. The paddles are there, but they made of plastic that bends and connected to software that’s inconsistent. MINI’s DCT – So Far a Missed Opportunity That is why the latest generation of MINI performance models, now equipped with a dual-clutch transmission (DCT), should be able to deliver an entirely new level of connection. On paper, a DCT is perfect for paddle shifting. The whole point of a dual-clutch system is lightning-fast shifts without power interruption, allowing the driver to stay fully engaged with the car’s rhythm. Yet if the paddles themselves feel flimsy or the engine and gearbox software dampen the immediacy of the shift, the whole experience falls flat. Additionally the responsive of the transmission, while better than previous generations, isn’t totally consistent. While it’s seemingly gotten better since the F66 was first introduced, there can be lags in certain scenarios on both upshifts and downshifts. A DCT can be as rewarding when paired with well-tuned programming, responsive hardware, and a paddle that feels like it’s firing a mechanical command. MINI seemingly has the foundation in the Getrag 7DCT300 DCT to make this happen. What seems to be missing is the more aggressive calibration that could be a part of a future sport or JCW mode. The Payoff Getting this right would transform everyday driving in a DCT equipped MINI. A well-designed paddle system, backed by a drivetrain that reacts instantly to every input, would turn an otherwise mundane commute into something immersive. Every downshift into a corner, every snappy upshift on an open stretch, would become a reminder of why you bought a MINI in the first place. This is not about pretending an automatic is a manual. It is about creating a consistent, rewarding link between a driver’s brain and the powertrain. The tactile satisfaction of a well-executed paddle shift is the kind of detail that leaves a lasting impression — and MINI is a brand that has always lived in the details. MINI has the hardware, the heritage, and the driver-focused DNA to make paddle-shifting a real part of its modern identity. It just needs to treat paddles not as a box to be checked on a spec sheet, but as a key part of what makes a MINI worth driving. The post MINI Cooper and Countryman Paddle Shifting Needs a Rethink – Here’s How appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Episode 701 turns our clock, officially, on 20 years. That’s pretty cool! Anyway, Odd shaped show this week. So odd, I’m going to recommend that you also listen to Black Roof on this one. I also included the link to the feed, so you can get them in your podcast app, automatically. For FREE! The latest from MotoringFile, like we like to do. All of the links are below, but make sure you click over to the mod post and chime in. Or, the comments here. They are open. Motoringfile.com Links https://www.motoringfile.com/2025/07/16/mini-usa-is-preparing-for-tariffs-with-2026-pricing-tweaks/ The post White Roof Radio 701: Fonzi the Dash appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

The MINI JCW GP is the ultimate expression of MINI’s motorsports roots for the road. A supercar in MINI form, the GP has been the crescendo of each of the previous MINI generations. Recently we reacquainted ourselves with the GP1 (R53) and GP2 (R56), and now it’s time to get back behind the wheel of the most powerful one of them all: the 2020 GP3. Special thanks to the MotoringFile reader (who wishes to remain anonymous) for lending us his low-mileage GP for the day. The MINI JCW GP lineage is one defined by extremes. With each generation, MINI has pushed the boundaries of its small car platform to create something purer, rawer, and more singularly focused than any of its other models. But the 2020 JCW GP3, officially known as the F56 GP, presents a more complex case. It’s a car of contradictions: brutal and composed, modern and awkward, fast and sometimes frustrating. And yet, like its predecessors, it’s unforgettable. So what do you do with a GP3 for a weekend when you live in Chicago? You immediately find a way out of the city—and in our case, head to Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. Driving Impressions: Fast, Flawed, and Fun Let’s start with what defines the GP3: raw performance. With 301 hp and 332 lb-ft of torque, it’s the most powerful production MINI Cooper (the small one) ever made. That power, routed exclusively through the front wheels via an 8-speed Aisin automatic, creates a car that is brutally quick in a straight line-quicker, in fact, than any previous GP by a large margin. In the real world, it’s not the 0–30 mph that impresses but the mid-range acceleration from 30–60 mph and beyond. It all makes for exhilarating highway on-ramps. But with that power comes compromise. Torque steer is very real, and while the electronic limited-slip differential does its best to keep things in check, this is a car that demands attention-especially when you’re applying that power out of corners. If you’re looking for a balanced, pure performance car, keep looking. Any front-wheel-drive car is inherently compromised when it comes to weight distribution and dynamics, but the GP3 takes it to another level. That said, flaws aren’t always bad. Sometimes they help define a car and ultimately endear it to you. Despite this rawness, it’s also strangely refined. The GP3 rides surprisingly well given its aggressive setup, especially compared to the R56 GP, which had a track-oriented, fully adjustable coil-over suspension. Fun fact: MINI heard from buyers that the R56 GP was too harsh to live with and thus decided to go back to a standard suspension setup nearly identical to the F56 JCW in the GP3. On paper that might sound controversial. But when it comes to what owners want, it was simply MINI answering their critique-for better or worse. The reality is that the GP3 is not as track-focused as you’d expect. But carving the country roads of Wisconsin, this latest GP is surprisingly comfortable while being fast and planted. Stopping power is excellent with the four-piston front brakes, and pedal feel is among the best we’ve ever felt in a MINI. While the massive front calipers look identical to those on the F60 JCW Countryman and F54 JCW Clubman, they have one critical difference. Due to expected track use, MINI made the GP3’s calipers from high-strength steel rather than aluminum for better heat dissipation. While they weigh more, MINI felt the trade-off was worth it to reduce brake fade during long track sessions. Now to the elephant in the room: this was the first GP offered only as an automatic. And not a dual-clutch, mind you-this is an old-school torque-converter Aisin automatic, taken directly from the F60 JCW Countryman and F54 JCW Clubman. It’s not a bad auto. Upshifts are quick, and it will hold gears in manual mode all the way to redline. But if you like engagement and use the lovely 3D-printed metal paddles, you’ll often feel like you’re fighting against it. The OG MINI GP1 (R53) is the most visceral of them all. Comparing Generations: GP1, GP2, and GP3 To understand the GP3, it’s essential to look at what came before. The original 2006 R53 MINI GP (GP1) was analog magic. With 215 hp and a six-speed manual, it was less powerful than its successors but far more visceral. There was no multi-stage traction control, no screens, and very little sound deadening. It felt like a homologation special-because in many ways, it was. Driving it was a sensory overload that demanded engagement and satisfied in ways that none of the other GPs (or MINIs) have since. That purity made it a cult classic, and in many eyes, still the high watermark. Our recent time behind the wheel only confirmed those memories. The 2013 MINI GP2 (R56) is the most track focused MINI of all time The 2013 R56 GP (GP2) amped things up. With 218 hp, a faster-shifting Getrag six-speed manual, and heavily revised suspension geometry, it was built for the track. It even wore Kumho V700 semi-slicks at launch (which came with a disclaimer). It was stiff, loud, and demanding-traits that made it less accessible but arguably the most focused GP of all. We loved it then, but we really love it now. Then came the GP3, which feels more like a modern interpretation of the GP formula. It’s wider, more stable, and more powerful, but also more insulated. In some ways, it’s the least extreme of the three in driver engagement but the most extreme in straight-line performance and visual presence. Design: Aggression Embodied There’s no denying the GP3 makes a statement. Even in rural Wisconsin it drew attention with its massive carbon fiber fenders, aggressive front splitter, and oversized rear wing. The composite wheel arch blades, developed through both design and aerodynamic necessity, split opinion but serve their purpose. The rear wing, a callback to MINI Challenge racers, didn’t add downforce but it did reduce lift-something that MINIs historically struggle with at triple-digit speeds. Inside, things are more subdued. The GP3 shares much with the standard JCW, save for its lack of rear seats, special digital instrumentation, and numbered dash badge. It feels more premium than either previous GP, but also a bit more conventional. What the GP3 Gets Right (and Wrong) The GP3 isn’t trying to be a track-day special in the traditional sense. Instead, it’s a unique type of performance car: a high-speed, limited-edition statement piece that offers a serious performance boost over the regular JCW but stops short of full-blown motorsport pretensions. It’s a car that stuns in a straight line, feels incredibly capable in corners, and offers just enough daily comfort to make it livable. But for some enthusiasts, especially those who loved the mechanical purity of the R53 or the edge of the R56, it feels like MINI lost something. The lack of a manual is a glaring omission. While DSC can be defeated, you’ll see that light flicker often due to all that torque going through the front wheels. And for all its visual drama, the driving experience can feel curiously filtered. Legacy and the Future Viewed in isolation, the GP3 is a riot. It’s a car that defies expectations and embraces its contradictions. It’s also a bridge to a new era-possibly the last ICE-powered GP we’ll ever see. As such, it carries weight, even if it diverges from the hardcore ethos of its predecessors. Taking the highway back gave us a lot of time to ponder the GP3’s place in MINI’s history. Ultimately, it’s not the perfect GP many had hoped for. But then again, neither were the GP1 or GP2. What matters is that it’s memorable, deeply flawed in ways that make it interesting, and utterly unique in a sea of increasingly sanitized performance cars. Five years on, MINI has dropped all manuals and even lost shift paddles in many of its models. The cars are faster and even perform better. But like the rest of the industry, they’re also more isolated and, while comfortable, less visceral than before. With the benefit of time, the GP3 now looks like an interesting point-perhaps even a high point-in MINI’s recent history. Its flaws make it endearing, and they make you, as the driver, have to think about driving just a bit more. And maybe that’s what being a GP is all about. 2020 MINI JCW GP3 Photo Gallery Processed with VSCO with a6 preset The post Revisiting the 2020 MINI GP3: Flawed, Fast, and Still Compelling appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Живо тут нынче

We can be harsh on MINI design at times but that’s mostly because when they get it right, it’s incredible. And for the new optional 18″ JCW wheels, MINI has gotten it very right. So much so that we think these might just be the best looking JCW wheel of all time. And the best part, there’s a good chance it fits your MINI. The 18” JCW Rallye Spoke is a close cousin to the 19″ Rally Spoke (536) was first offered on the F60 Countryman in 2017. Those wheels gave off serious 2000s WRC rally car vibes and we’ve loved them ever since. They were the antithesis of the open wheel design trend and looked almost brutal in comparison. Left: the original 536 Rally Spoke. Right: the new 964 Rallye Spoke These new Rallye Spokes (yes MINI has officially spelled the differently this time) evoke a vintage 90’s rally car look. In fact they’re quite reminiscent of the the classic wheel from OZ simply called “Rally Racing“. Here’s a detailed look at both new wheels, the technical data, available colors and how they compare with the original Rally Spoke Wheels. CodeModelsColorsWidthDiameterTire sizeOffset964F65, F66, F67, F55, F56, F57*Frozen Midnight Grey, Vibrant Silver7″18215/40/18ET:50mm992J01, J05, U25*Frozen Midnight Grey, Vibrant Silver7.5″18225/40/18ET:50mm536 – OriginalF54, F60, U25Orbit Grey Matte, Aspen Gloss8″19225/45/19ET:47mm* The 964 should technically fit the F54 & F60 536 Aspen White Gloss 536 Orbit Grey Matte 964 / 992 Frozen Midnight 964 / 992 Vibrant Silver The 964 model will fit every 3rd and 4th generation MINI Cooper; however, we cannot yet confirm if it will fit the F56 JCW models with the larger front calipers. The 992 is the same diameter but is wider, allowing for a wider tire. It will fit the new J01 and J05 generation cars along with the new U25 Countryman. It should also fit the F54 Clubman and F60 Countryman; however, the same caveats apply to the JCW brakes as they do on the 964. You can grab a set of the new Rallye Spokes from your local MINI dealer. If you’re in the US and want what will likely be the best pricing, check out our friends at Outmotoring.com. JCW Rallye Spoke Wheels Gallery The post MINI Debuts Stunning New JCW Wheel And It Likely Fits Your MINI appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Munich may be buzzing about BMW’s first Neue Klasse model, but MINI has quietly commandeered its own spotlight at IAA Mobility 2025 with rumors of two new JCW show cars. Here’s what we know. MINI will unveil not one but two John Cooper Works show cars, each making its world premiere during the six-day event. Details are still under wraps, yet the brand promises “attention-grabbing presence” that underscores motorsport as a core pillar of MINI DNA. Given the timing, and MINI’s recent Nürburgring class victories, we expect something in the form of special edition models. But MINI could surprise us with all new concepts that foretell a higher level of JCW performance. And then there’s the rumors of a Countryman JCW EV that keep popping up. A dual-site offensive across central Munich MINI is splitting its presence between the Open Space at Max-Joseph-Platz and a fully refurbished MINI Pavillon on Lenbachplatz. The Open Space setting gives casual visitors a taste of the brand’s lifestyle vibe, while the Pavillon becomes an all-in JCW temple complete with fresh design treatments, merchandise, and the two headline show cars front-and-center. Think of it as a live, week-long celebration of the brand. MotoringFile’s take In typical MINI fashion, the brand is using spectacle and story-telling to punch above its weight at a show dominated by tech-heavy EVs. The decision to center everything around JCW—rather than broader sustainability talking points—feels like a welcome return to form. The post Two MINI JCW Concept Cars Coming to the Munich IAA This September appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Здравствуйте! У меня на R50 не включается монитор совсем, в чем может быть причина. Заранее благодарна за помощь

Special editions have finally arrived for MINI’s new generation, and the first two are eye-catchers. Called the 66 Collection, this pair celebrates the brand’s 66th birthday with heritage-inspired graphics and factory-fitted JCW accessories while introducing the first-ever John Cooper Works Electric alongside the latest petrol JCW. Only six cars are earmarked for Singapore, and they are, in our view, the best-looking examples of the new platform so far. But my lord are they pricey. No extra go, just Extra Retro show There are no mechanical changes here. Power, torque, suspension settings, and tyre specs mirror the standard JCW Electric and JCW petrol models. The difference lies in a factory bundle of JCW accessories that owners would normally have to order à la carte: 18-inch Rallye Spoke wheels with self-levelling hub caps Red-and-black Multitone roof on the Electric Heritage “66” bonnet and door graphics Gloss-black aero pieces, including a deeper rear diffuser and C-pillar aeroblade Think of it as a styling package with a numbered plaque straight from Oxford. But wow, do these special editions look good to us. In fact, these are easily the best-looking MINIs we’ve seen from this fourth generation of cars that were released 18 months ago. While there are no interior changes, the exterior colors, trim, accessories, and even wheels create a vintage vibe that’s been missing from modern MINIs for the past couple of years. Two drivetrains – No Mechanical Changes ModelPowertrainOutput0-100 km/hRange / Top speedJCW ElectricSingle-motor BEV258 hp / 258 ft lbs6.0 s*124 mphJCW Petrol2.0-litre turbo-four231 hp / 280 ft lbs6.1 s155 mph*with 20 kW overboost engaged Both cars keep the standard power output and chassis tune. The Electric retains its model-specific damping and sticky rubber, while the petrol JCW stays with the familiar dual-clutch gearbox and loads of extra . Pricing will hinge on exclusivity and accessories rather than any performance lift. Pricing is Not For the Faint of Heart First off, I hope you’re sitting down. The cost of these special editions will be eye-watering or anyone not use to Singapore car pricing. ModelPricingMINI John Cooper Works Petrol (F66)$302,888 (235,189 USD)MINI John Cooper Works EV (J01)$267,888 (208,012 USD) Cars in Singapore feel eye-wateringly expensive because the Government stacks multiple layers of taxes and quotas on top of a vehicle’s base price, all designed to keep private-car numbers in check on a very small island. Here is how the cost pyramid works. Cost layerWhat it isTypical impactOpen Market Value (OMV)Assessed import value of the car before local taxesExample: S$25 000 for a small hatchExcise Duty20 percent of OMVAdds S$5 000 on that hatch GST9 percent of (OMV + Excise)Adds another ~S$2 700 Registration FeeFlat S$350Minor but unavoidable Additional Registration Fee (ARF)Tiered tax of 100–320 percent of OMV (higher tiers for pricier cars)Can triple the OMV; that small hatch now owes S$25 000 more Certificate of Entitlement (COE)Ten-year auction permit that caps vehicle numbersBids hovered around S$100 000 for most car categories in 2025 Vehicular Emissions Scheme & Road TaxEmissions surcharge or rebate plus annual engine-size taxAdds a few hundred to several thousand dollars each year In other words, don’t blame MINI for this one. Singapore Only But Potentially More Markets to Follow MINI Asia loves a boutique run, and the 66th birthday provided the perfect excuse. However if you know how MINI works, don’t be surprised to see similar appearance packs landing in other markets within the next year. After all accessories-plus-graphics formula scales easily without extra homologation costs. The post First Look: MINI’s 66 Collection – Retro Inspired Limited Edition appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Back in 2006, MINI did something no one expected: it built a stripped-down, track-focused, limited-edition car with no rear seats, no sound deadening, and a massive rear wing that screamed not your average Cooper S. Officially dubbed the MINI Cooper S with John Cooper Works GP Kit—more simply known as the GP or GP1—it was the first factory-built MINI intended for the track, and for many, it remains the most raw and unfiltered. Only 2,000 were made worldwide, and just 415 came to the U.S. market, each individually numbered and finished exclusively in Thunder Blue with a Pure Silver roof and signature red mirror caps. At $31,150, it was the most expensive MINI ever sold at the time—nearly $10,000 more than the standard Cooper S. But 18 years on, does it hold up? The Drive: All About Feel From the moment you step in, it’s clear the GP is from another era. There’s no iDrive, no drive modes, no massive touchscreens—just three pedals, a six-speed manual, and a supercharger that whines like a race car. The GP didn’t chase horsepower; it stuck with the same 1.6L supercharged engine as the JCW of the time but with a few key tweaks. Output climbed to 215 hp and 184 lb-ft of torque—modest by today’s standards but more than enough in a car that weighs under 2,500 lbs. MINI’s focus wasn’t straight-line speed—it was cornering grip and driver engagement. The GP got stiffer springs, unique shocks co-developed with Bilstein and revised bushings. On the road—or better yet, on a track—it’s alive with feedback. Steering is quick and direct, turn-in is immediate thanks to the 50 lbs saved by ditching the rear seats. It’s not refined by any stretch. The ride is firm, bordering on punishing over bad pavement, and the cabin is loud. But that’s the point. This car doesn’t isolate you from the road—it broadcasts every bump, every change in grip, every ounce of effort the chassis is making. It demands attention and rewards precision. Design and Details: Less is More Beyond the dramatic rear wing, the GP’s exterior upgrades are subtle but effective. The unique front and rear aprons give it a more aggressive stance, and the bespoke 18-inch wheels—lighter than the stock JCW wheels—save unsprung weight. Underneath, there’s even an underbody tray for improved aerodynamics. Inside, it’s business-like. The rear seats are gone, replaced by a cross-brace and GP-branded carpeted panels. The seats in the US are unfortunately just the standard MINI sport seats. We didn’t get the Recaros due to the lack of an airbag sensor in the passenger seat. That last part underlines one of the themes of the R53 GP. This was a parts bin project pulled together quickly and with what could be borrowed or created fast. But sometimes with rapid development comes great products. Legacy: Why the GP Still Matters The 2006 GP was more than just a special edition—it was MINI proving it could build a proper driver’s car, something that could hold its own with track-focused cars from much larger brands. It also laid the groundwork for a legacy, one that continued with the GP2 and GP3. But ask any MINI purist, and they’ll likely tell you the original is still the best. Why? It’s the purity. The first GP has no automatic option, limited electronic nannies stepping in mid-corner, and no frills. It’s just you, the car, and the road. In many ways, it represents the last truly analog MINI—a car that predates turbos, oversized wheels, and touchscreen everything. Final Verdict Eighteen years on, the 2006 MINI GP remains one of the most engaging and visceral cars the brand has ever produced. It wasn’t about straight-line speed—it was about feel, feedback, and fun. Today, its rarity and rawness have made it a collector’s item, but for those lucky enough to drive one, the GP is more than a museum piece. It’s a reminder that sometimes less really is more—and that true driver’s cars never go out of style. The post Revisiting the Original 2006 MINI GP: Raw, Rare and Still Remarkable appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

MINI has heard customers and is beginning to dial back some of the more outlandish styling elements on the new MINIs. Enter the new style-focused special editions the Cooper Electric Monochrome and Aceman Monochrome. Both sit on the “E” powertrain and, while they carry the exact same on-the-road prices as the entry-level Classic trims – £26,905 for the Cooper and £28,905 for the Aceman, they come with a bit more standard equipment. What Actually Changes? Exterior touches Buyers pick between Midnight Black or Nanuq White paint, both paired with a body-colour roof for a cleaner silhouette. The Cooper rolls on 17-inch U Spoke Grey alloys, while the Aceman steps up to 18-inch Night Flash Spoke Greys (both previously only available as part of the Exclusive Pack) Cabin upgrades Gone is the Vescin synthetic leather and in its place a multitone fabric that spreads across both seat rows, finished with contrast white and yellow stitching. Above MINI is offering the anthracite headliner free of charge. The dashboard gets a black cloth wrap and the same fabric on its passenger-side strap, tying the look together. Tech and comfort Standard kit continues to include MINI Navigation with head-up display, wireless phone charging, LED headlights, adaptive cruise (DCC), Driving Assistant, Parking Assistant with rear camera, heated front seats and the full suite of MINI Experience Modes. All of it is operated through the 24 cm circular OLED screen that dominates the dash. Powertrain and charging The Cooper Electric Monochrome sticks with the familiar 40.7 kWh pack, good for up to 189 miles on the WLTP cycle, while the Aceman Monochrome benefits from a slightly larger 42.5 kWh battery and a 192-mile headline range. Both accept 75 kW DC fast charging, so a 10-80 per cent top-up should take around half an hour. Why the More Subdued Look? MINI has clearly heard the feedback that getting a subtle looking car was not easy without spending thousands of pounds. This new edition allows buyers to get a simple and refined looking Cooper or Aceman at the base price of both models. Orders open now UK dealers are taking orders for the Cooper Electric Monochrome at £26,905 and the Aceman Monochrome at £28,905, both on the road. First deliveries are expected later this year, and there’s no word yet on whether these value-laden trims will migrate to other markets. For UK shoppers who have been eyeing an electric MINI but felt the spec sheet looked thin next to the competition, the Monochrome twins could be the sweet spot – no options list deep-dive required. The post MINI Cooper & Aceman Monochrome Editions: Less Flair and More Value appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

MINI USA has teamed up with global fitness favorite Barry’s to make the iconic hatch the unofficial runabout of Barry’s studios this summer. The collaboration focuses on the two brands’ shared values—community and inclusivity—while adding a dose of MINI’s go-kart attitude to Barry’s high-energy workouts. From now through September, Barry’s instructors in the Hamptons, Los Angeles and Chicago will swap their usual commute for the driver’s seat of a MINI. The cars will shuttle trainers between studios, beach runs and coffee stops, giving clients plenty of chances to see the cars in action—and maybe grab a passenger-seat selfie. Inside the studio, select “RUN x LIFT: Full Throttle with MINI” classes introduce MINI-themed playlists, limited-edition swag and complimentary Fuel Bar shakes in Chicago and LA. The 50-minute sessions blend Barry’s signature treadmill intervals with floor-based strength work, a format that mirrors MINI’s own mix of efficiency and punchy performance. “At MINI we talk a lot about fun, but it only matters when everyone feels welcome,” said Kate Alini, MINI USA’s head of marketing, product and strategy. “Barry’s builds that same sense of belonging, so putting our cars in their coaches’ hands felt like a natural extension.” Dan Rabinovich, Barry’s senior director of brand partnerships, echoed the sentiment: “Our Red Room is a place where people push hard together. MINI brings that spirit to the street, giving our community another way to move, connect and live full throttle.” The partnership launched quietly in June, and both brands hint at more activations to come before summer’s over. Keep an eye on Barry’s schedules—and the local parking lot—to see what rolls out next. The post MINI USA and Barry’s Partnership Makes MINI the Official Car of Summer Workouts appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

When BMW of North America agreed to import the newly reimagined MINI Cooper in the early 2000s, most assumed it would be an unmitigated disaster. Small cars have never had it easy in the United States. For decades they were viewed as stripped-down rides for bargain hunters rather than savvy choices for drivers who simply preferred something light, thrifty, and compact. But the R50 MINI rewrote those rules and thanks to small group inside BMWNA, America got to experience it. This is that story. The R50 MINI Cooper was tiny (for US standards), efficient, and—crucially—huge fun. Suddenly the small-car stigma vanished. Buyers fell hard for the MINI’s premium feel and off-beat personality, and they didn’t just form a customer base—they built a community here and elsewhere. None of this was obvious when BMW bought the Rover Group in 1994. Tucked inside that purchase was “Mini,” one of several British badges bundled with old factories, questionable build quality, and plenty of labor strife. Within six years BMW had shed nearly everything but kept Mini, pairing it with Rolls-Royce in a strategic three-brand plan. Rolls would sit above BMW as the ultra-luxury halo, while Mini would sit below, letting BMW enter the front-drive city-car game without tainting its rear-drive reputation (that would come later, ironically thanks to MINI). To make the new car stand apart, BMW capitalized MINI in all caps. It also gutted the tired 1912 Morris Motors plant in Cowley, Oxford, and built a modern factory inside the original brick shell. Then came a clean-sheet design to replace the classic Issigonis Mini that had soldiered on, more or less unchanged, since 1959. The original Mini was a ’60s fashion icon and rally terror—Monte Carlo winner in ’64, ’65, and ’67—so re-imagining it was always going to be tricky. Early ideas ranged from the Adrian van Hooydonk-penned ACV30 concept to a budget-minded Rover proposal, but BMW ultimately chose Frank Stephenson’s “what if the Mini had evolved over 30 years” sketch. Under the sheet-metal, engineers blended Rover know-how with BMW hardware: MacPherson struts up front, a multi-link rear, then-cutting-edge stability tech, and a Brazilian-built four-cylinder. The car bowled over journalists at its 2000 Paris reveal and again during the 2001 launch drive. Bimmer magazine hailed its blend of ride polish, handling snap, and style as a new benchmark for the super-mini set. Middle: some of the original MINI USA team At first, BMW hadn’t confirmed U.S. sales. Behind the scenes, though, Victor Doolan’s team at BMW of North America spent six years figuring out how to make the numbers work. Their answer: lean dealer operations shared with BMW showrooms, plus a premium lineup that started with the 113-horsepower Cooper rather than the entry-level MINI One sold elsewhere. The hotter Cooper S and later John Cooper Works would sit above it. The plan survived boardroom shake-ups, leadership swaps, and plenty of skeptics. Tom Purves, arriving as CEO in 1999, was a believer. MINI USA became an official division that December with Rich Steinberg as employee No. 1. Early comms relied on PR wizard Andrew Cutler, then on a bold agency pick: Crispin Porter + Bogusky. On a modest $25 million budget, CP+B sidestepped TV, plastered cities with cheeky billboards, and stuffed magazines with tear-out inserts that friends could pass around. “Let’s Motor” became a rallying cry that gently mocked SUV excess while celebrating nimble fun. The payoff was instant. By the March 2002 on-sale date more than 50,000 shoppers had registered interest online before MINI stores even opened. And when they did (we were there) the showrooms were packed. MINI moved over 24,000 cars that year, jumped to 36,000 in 2003, and could have sold more if Oxford had built them fast enough. Even the wait list became part of the fun. Buyers tracked their cars from assembly line to Atlantic crossing with the “Make Waiting Fun” campaign—an idea later copied by plenty of brands. Once owners had their keys, MINI’s community spirit exploded. The Book of Motoring urged drivers to wave at fellow MINIs, and many did. CP+B’s ads nudged owners to hit the open road, which birthed 2006’s first MINI Takes the States: 4,000 cars, 17 days, New York to San Francisco, and a legend was born. In 2005 Jim McDowell took the reins and pushed the brand deeper into experiential territory—think Motortober dealership parties and a KISS-themed charity run. MINI also became BMW’s test bed for electrification with the 2009 MINI E, a pioneering, if range-challenged, EV. Sales peaked at 66,502 in 2013. Since then the lineup has flexed with market tastes, adding and dropping body styles and powertrains. Under current chief Michael Peyton, four distinct silhouettes—two-door, four-door, convertible, and compact SUV—cover eleven trim variants, each available with petrol or battery power. Inside BMW NA, MINI remains that nimble skunkworks where a half-dozen staffers can still shape national marketing. Former marketing boss Tom Salkowsky sums it up best: “We’d solve problems with a few pizzas, a couple of beers, and a whiteboard.” The spirit Jack Pitney ignited in 2001 still fuels the brand today. More than twenty years on, MINI is still the plucky, fun-to-drive choice with outsized character. MINI USA continues to stage coast-to-coast adventures, partner with design houses like Pantone—the 2025 Mocha Mousse convertible wrap turned plenty of heads—and champion a community that loves to motor, explore, and share the road. And that may be MINI’s greatest success: transforming a tiny hatch into a rolling invitation to join something bigger than the car itself. The post How MINI Conquered the U.S. 23 years Ago With a Small Team, Small Budgets and Small Cars appeared first on MotoringFile. View the full article

Друзья, привет! Спустя почти 11 лет возввращаюсь к истокам - к Mini. На этот раз будем ездить (в основном супруга) на U25. Вопрос: не натыкался ли кто-либо на каталог запчастей и аксессуаров к третьему поколению Кантримена? Спасибо!